Jodie and Mary are twins joined at their turn away abdomens. Jodie is an alert baby, with functioning heart and lungs. Mary has no trenchant heart or lung function and lives purely because of her attachment to Jodie. correspond to commonly accepted medical evidence, Jodie?s life would be virtually as long as, and would have the quality of, that of either ordinary child if unconnected from Mary. It is clear that if the twins were dislocated then Mary would die. Equally, it is clear that if the twins were not separated then eventually Jodie?s heart and lungs will pass out and both twins will die. The parents are resolutely distant to any surgery for the twins as they feel it would be morally wrong to intentionally cause the goal of unmatched of their twins.
The doctors have two choices. They can apply to the courts to undergo the operation against the parents? wishes, or they can respect the parents? wishes and not operate.
A scenario analogous this raises a number of issues, whether it be the individuals involved, the laws or the challenges involved in making the ?right? decision. In addition many good questions usually arise in trying to understand or explain the situation. For example, will the outcome of the surgery be successful? Is sacrificing one twin to save the other justified?
In this old case of conjoined twins, the decision on separation presents a conflict of interest between the parents? values and the medical professionals? expertise or duty. The outcome also presents a ray of possibilities. firstly if surgery is carried out, there are a number of potential results e.g. a successful separation, the death of the weaker twin, the separation resulting in the death of both twins or a risk of long-term complications during and after surgery. However if the...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment