Andrea Yates was a mother of five, living in Texas, suffering from ascetic postpartum depression. One day she drowned her five children at main office in her bathtub beca apply she believed she was a bad mother. She tried to use one of the most contr oversial excuses as her defense. This exculpation is the madness defense. Many people believe that this plea is widely over used, when in fact it is very rarely used at all. Postpartum depression is also questioned by most on whether or not this disorder is characterized as a realistic mental illness.
In March 2002, Yates was convicted of drowning three of her five children. The prosecution was able to convince the jury that Yates may have been mentally ill, but she was still capable of knowing what she was doing while drowning her children. fit in to Texas law, in order for Yates to be granted the insanity plea she had to be insane to the point where she would not know righteousness from wrong at the time of the crime.
This case was brought to the Texas 1st administration of Appeals because the expert witness for the state, Dr. Park Deitz made false statements proverb that Yates was a big fan of the show ?Law and ramble? and she may have been influenced to kill her children from an possibility that was aired.
Deitz was a adviser for the show, and as apart of the appea,l the defense contacted NBC which informed them that such an episode never aired. The appeals court believes that Deitz did not commit perjury by design and that he had no idea that he was giving a false testimony.Dietz has been in such nationally known kill trials such as Susan Smith, Jeffrey Dahmer, and the ?unabomber? Ted Kaczynski. So the defense believes that...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment