PRIDE & PREJUDICE: Literature into Film

" While Mrs. Bennet comments on matter as these at home earlier in the raw, she does non do so at Netherfield. This adds to the comedic t one and whole(a) of the direct, bounteous with comic facial gestures by some of the daughters in reaction to what she tells them.

There are also summational bits of conference in the moving-picture show that don't exist at all in the novel. For example, in the novel we are told Jane and Bingley dance together and also that Darcy and lack Bingley dance together. However, in the film we see Bingley ask one of the servants to introduce him to Jane in order to dance and we see Darcy and mislay Bingley converse before they dance and during their dance. During this dance additional dialogue is added in the film for Miss Bingley. She expresses her general contempt and vainglory for the middle-class guests at the dinner. This is not dialogue in the novel entirely it is included by the director to help strengthen the haughty and contemptuous character of Miss Bingley. The director only has two hours to convey to audiences what Austen revealed over the course of 320 pages.

There are also additions of dialogue and character interaction when it comes to Darcy and Elizabeth. These changes in the film are in keeping with the tone of the novel during this scene, but the content is greatly changed. For example, in the book Darcy malignments Elizabeth who overhears him: "She is toler satisfactory, but not handsome enough to tempt me; I am in

Austen, J. Pride and Prejudice. New York, random House, 1950.

There is another significant change that occurs where Elizabeth's reaction to Darcy's insult is concerned. Un similar the last difference discussed, this one appears to have a valid cinematic justification. In the novel, after Elizabeth overhears Darcy's insults, Austen describes her reaction and tells us that Elizabeth's particular character was of such a nature that she was able to view the "absurd" comments humorously: "Mr. Darcy walked off; and Elizabeth remained with no in truth cordial feelings toward him. She told the story, however, with great spirit among her friends; for she had a lively, playful disposition, which cheery in anything ridiculous" (Austen 10).

In the novel this expositorily informs us of accepted of Elizabeth's character qualities. However, since film is a visual medium the filmmakers turn out us these character qualities by allowing Elizabeth additional dialogue in the film wherein we get to see her actually humorously jeer Darcy's insulting words by repeating them to her friends. We can take in this type of change because of the differences between the two mediums. In addition the acting talent in the film is superior and Greer Garson as Elizabeth make the most out of this moment by nettlesome the deep, haughty contemptuous speech of Darcy.

no humour at present to breach consequence to young ladies who are lissomeed by other men" (Austen 10). In the film Darcy is much much derogatory in length and this particular line of dialogue, like many others, is significantly changed. Darcy says in the film: "I am in no humour at present to give consequences to the middle-classes at play." While the line used in the film still demonstrates the intention of the line in the book?that Darcy is beat of pride?one can't help but understand wherefore the filmmakers changed a slight from Darcy to Elizabeth, the main romance of the novel, to a slight to the middle-classes in general.

Pri
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!