Kant and Moral Values Essay -- Philosophy Essays Papers

Kant says that clean-living value ar good without qualification. This assertion and similar remarks of Plato washbasin be understood in terms of a return to honorable data themselves in the following ways 1. incorrupt values atomic number 18 objectively good and not relative to our judgments 2. moral uprightness is immanent goodness grounded in the nature of acts and independent of our subjective satisfaction 3. Moral goodness expresses in an essentially new and higher common sense of the view of value as such 4. Moral Goodness good dealnot be mistreated like intellectual, aesthetic, temperamental and another(prenominal) values 5. Moral values ar good in that they never must be sacrificed for any other value, because they be incomparably higher and should absolutely and first be seek for 6. Moral goodness makes the person as such good 7. exclusively three different modes of participation in moral values are linked to the absolute, most necessary and highest good for th e person 8. Moral set are goods in the unrestricted sense by being beautiful perfections in the sense that neither in this world nor outside it can we find anything that could be called good unqualifiedly except moral goodness which is absolutely better to possess than not to possess. 9. Moral Values are unconditionally good because they are never just means towards ends. 10. Moral values imply a new type of ought which elucidates the absolute sense in which they are good. Conclusion These distinctions allow a better delve of Kant and Plato as well as of a central ethical impartiality decisive for the moral education of humankind. Kant calls moral values the only values that are good without qualification, and thereby states something very profound about morality. let us read his great text in which he expresses ma... ...1961. S. 58-84.(8) date John Finnis, Fundamentals of Ethics (Oxford Clarendon Press, 1983) see also the same author, earthy Law and Natural Rights (Oxford Cla rendon Press, 1980).(9) See on this Anselm von Canterbury. Monologion, ch. 15. See also Josef Seifert, Essere e persona. Verso una fondazione fenomenologica di una metafisica classica e personalistica. (Milano Vita e Pensiero, 1989), ch. 5.(10) Also in Anselm the deepest meaning of maius is a moral one. Compare my Gott als Gottesbeweis (Heidelberg Universittsverlag C. Winter, 1996), ch. 11.(11) See on this Ethics, 2nd edn (Chicago Franciscan Herald Press, 1978), ch. 17-18 Josef Seifert, Josef Seifert, Essere e persona, cit., ch. 9.(12) On a sevenfold motivation of moral acts see Josef Seifert, Was ist und was motiviert eine sittliche Handlung? (Salzburg Univ.Verlag A. Pustet, 1976).