Julius Caesar was, probably, a central figure of the last years of papist commonwealth. He was great orator, politician and general. He always had to be the first and was totally ruthless in pursuit of his goals and ambitions. He was loved by a lot of Romans, especially by lower class, and a lot of people recognized him as a human god. On 15th of March, 44 B.C. he was called to the Theatre of Pompey to discuss the preparations for the war against Parthia, and was killed by a grouping of 23 senators which pulled out knifes from under their togas stabbed him to death 1 period each. But was his death commodity or noxious for capital of Italy? Without doubts he had done a lot of correct for the republic by conquering other lands and extending its territory. Perhaps he would be a middling good politician if he wasnt killed so short after he was declared dictator for life, scarce he was killed non for being good or bad dictator, but just for being a dictator. Not so long time ago Romans threw out the king, and now they had pretty much the same situation, only now king was called dictator. Romans were idealistic for their republic and a lot of them didnt want their country to utter this status.
I dont mystify anything against the Caesar himself, but I have to contain with his assassins - the death of Caesar war a right thing. The man himself was a great person, and, probably, he would be a really good dictator, but I dont believe in dictatorship. He would have passed this tradition to his children and they might not be as good as he was. Just one person should not have an absolute power over the lives of thousands...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment