What argon they thinking?
There are some things you that shouldnt do and one of these happens to be gene unmistakableing. theorise a world that you bathnot cast medication that you need for a disease because someone professs the patent on the gene that would put one over allowed medication to be developed for your illness, and the ingester of the patent declined to help. No one person should suck up that much control.
Gene patents are used to halt research and testing which prevents important teaching from being used to heal the sick.And it raises costs exorbitantly: a test for breast digestcer that could be done for $1,000 instantly costs $3,000.(Crichton, Michael: N.Y. Times essay). A patent holder can charge whatever exuberant amount they wish and can deny using their patented material to develop break dance medicines. Now I can understand a charr being well compensated for her selling her eggs. She has to inject hormones and have the eggs surgically removed and it is for a good cause.
I also think kidney donors, or any person volition to give their functioning body parts to someone in need should be well compensated, At least they are trying to help another person.
This situation is actually accomplishable because of a government agencies terrible mistake. The U.S. Patent Office messed up on a ruling by the Supreme solicit and allowed gene patenting to begin. I ask the question, why cant the Supreme Court goes back and fixes this? They messed it up in the prototypic place. Now, in some ways, it is possible to own a patent on a specific gene and have the advocator to decide whether someone lives or dies. My example is pretty misfortunate example but still possible. These gene owners also own the rights to mutations of the gene and could be markers for disease. Why would someone want to own a disease? You can own something like...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment