The United State the Champion

This change did in item take place with respect to civil rights under Kennedy, and because the Great hunting lodge under Lyndon Johnson. Johnson pushed a number of mixer programs for progress through Congress after the assassination of Kennedy, careen that the passage of legislation installing such programs would honor the holding of Kennedy who had begun them. The Great Society is often criticized today for its lack of long-run effects and its extravagant spending on domestic issues, only John A. Andrew III in Lyndon Johnson and the Great Society writes that in fact the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the 1965 Voting Rights Act were important laws which marked turning points in the civil rights movement. Other mixer programs, Andrew says, non only did help millions of Ameri crumbs live better lives, they were also expressions of Johnson's desire to right the racial wrongs of the past (Andrew 184-185).

It is ironic that Johnson's major(ip) inappropriate policy-- warfare in Vietnam--was the primary reason that the Great Society began to fail. Johnson and the nation simply could not support a war abroad and the kind of expensive domestic programs proposed by Johnson. non caring about the people of Vietnam, but being goaded by a fear and hatred of communism, like leaders before and after him, undermined the good Johnson had done on behalf of the intimately needy Americans at foundation.

Both Kennedy and Johnson raised pub

The thesis of Larry Ber domain's book is "the repercussions from President Johnson's failure to utter the fundamental incompatibility between his policy-making objectives at firm and his military objectives in Vietnam" (Berman xi). That failure, and those incompatibilities, are at the heart of the deviance between the domestic policy in the unify States from 1960 to 1974 and the foreign policy of the nation in those same years. From Kennedy to Johnson to Nixon, domestic policies were aim in place and administered which started the long process toward greater social, political and economic justice at home. Meanwhile, in Vietnam, an unjust war was waged and escalated and undermined so much of that domestic good.

Nixon's opening of ties with China was certainly a de posture from Cold War ideology (Matthews 256), although it can be argued that again Nixon was trying to divide the two communist superpowers, China and the Soviet Union. It can certainly be argued that Nixon was not concerned with bettering the lives of the Chinese people, but was instead concerned with political, economic, and ideological objectives.

For all the bluster from Johnson and Nixon that the Vietnam War was carried out by the United States in order to save democracy and freedom for southeast Vietnam, the fact remains that the government of South Vietnam was not a democratic representative government, was in fact a puppet government of the United States, and was corrupt and ineffective. In fact, the American antagonist to the war can be fixed in part to the callous disregard of President Diem for the Buddhist monks who burned themselves to conclusion in protest against the injustices of Diem (Kaiser 4).

Johnson, in the Foreword to Kennedy's The Burden and the Glory, notes the power Kennedy played in advancing the cause of freedom and peace, in developing and executing domestic and foreign policy. Johnson writes that Kennedy was a man who built hope for peace and freedom at home and abroad. In li
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!